-
Recent Posts
- Two Uniformed National Guardsman Shot and Killed in Nevada
- The Front Page: Obama’s Pet Solar Energy Company Going Bankrupt
- Wife sues husband for not having sex with her
- Labor Secretary Supports American Jobs by Buying Canadian SUV
- Workers Cost More – Produce Less
- Millions, Billions and Trillions
- My Head May Explode
- Obama Administration Cracks Down on Gibson Guitars
- Arizona Budget Problems Tied to Stop Smoking Campaigns
- EPA Funds Green Groups and Tells Them How to Sue the Government
Archives
Copyright © 2009-2012 I Still Don't Get It All rights reserved.
Why You Shouldn’t Be Upset About the “Citizens United” Supreme Court Ruling
No recent Supreme Court ruling have evoked more liberal fury than Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, a campaign-finance case involving government censorship of a political documentary called Hillary: The Movie.
The Federal Election Commission prevented the anti-Hillary Clinton film from being shown on television just before the 2008 Democratic primaries, a decision that was upheld by lower courts. Siding with The First Amendment, the Court struck down laws regulating independent political advertising by for-profit and non-profit corporations before an election even as they reaffirmed rules about disclosure and disclosures for ads and against direct corporate giving to candidates.
Tags: Campaign Finance, Citizens United, Supreme Court Ruling